Frosh, Stephen (2008) On negative critique: a reply. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 13 (4), pp. 416-422. ISSN 1088-0763.
Abstract
This paper responds to issues raised by those commentators adopting a “British School” psychoanalytic perspective for psychosocial studies (Hollway, Hoggett, Jefferson, and Rustin). Our focus on Wendy Hollway's work is explained, and the logic of our discussion of reflexivity is clarified. The response examines five further issues: psychosocial studies as a discipline, psychoanalysis as a clinical practice, the discursive turn, “Lacan vs Klein”, and “inner” vs “outer” worlds. The paper concludes with a reiteration of the value of “negative” critique.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Keyword(s) / Subject(s): | psychosocial studies, reflexivity, negativity, applied psychoanalysis |
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Social Sciences |
| Research Centres and Institutes: | Mapping Maternal Subjectivities, Identities and Ethics (MAMSIE) |
| Depositing User: | Administrator |
| Date Deposited: | 17 May 2011 10:17 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 16:52 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/2194 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
