Fletcher, C. and Wilson, C. and Hutchinson, A. and Grunfeld, Elizabeth (2018) The relationship between anticipated response and subsequent experience of cancer treatment-related side effects: a meta-analysis comparing effects before and after treatment exposure. Cancer Treatment Reviews 68 , pp. 86-93. ISSN 0305-7372.
|
Text
22858.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (772kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objective: To review the evidence for a systematic relationship between cancer patients’ pre-treatment expectations (anticipated side effects) and subsequent experience of treatment-related side effects, and to compare this relationship in patients with no prior treatment experience (cognitive expectations) and with some prior treatment experience (conditioned response). Methods: A total of 12,952 citations were identified through a comprehensive search of the literature published on or before November 2016 and screened against inclusion criteria. Studies were eligible if they included participants undergoing curative treatment for cancer, measured a treatment side effect, examined the relationship between anticipation and experience of side effects, and reported quantitative data. Results: Thirty-one studies were included in the review and meta-analysis (total N = 5,069). The side effects examined were nausea (anticipatory and post-treatment), vomiting, fatigue, pain, problems with concentration, and skin reactions. Meta-analyses indicated significant and positive associations between anticipation and subsequent experience for all included side effects in patients with no prior treatment exposure (r = 0.153 – 0.431). Stronger associations were found for all included conditioned side effects in patients with previous treatment experience (r = 0.211 – 0.476). No significant differences were found when overall effect sizes for patients with and without prior treatment exposure were compared for each side effect, except for anticipatory nausea (p = 0.012). Conclusion: These results may have implications for future interventions that target patients’ expectations of cancer treatment-related side effects. Future research could explore patient reports of messages received about likely treatment effects both before and during treatment.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Keyword(s) / Subject(s): | Cancer, Cancer treatment, Conditioning, Expectancies, Expectancy, Side effects |
School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Science > School of Psychological Sciences |
Depositing User: | Beth Grunfeld |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jun 2018 10:17 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:42 |
URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/22858 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.