Categories of literature

Friend, Stacie (2020) Categories of literature. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1), pp. 70-74. ISSN 1540-6245.

Abstract

Kendall Walton’s “Categories of Art” (1970) is one of the most important and influential papers in twentieth-century aesthetics. It is almost universally taken to refute traditional aesthetic formalism/empiricism, according to which all that matters aesthetically is what is manifest to perception. “Categories” thus played a key role in ushering in the ascendancy of contextualism in the philosophy of art, generating widespread agreement with Walton’s conclusion “that (some) facts about the origins of works of art have an essential role in criticism” (337). Although most commentators assume that Walton's argument encompasses works of literature, in fact it turns on features of sensory perception, specifically “perception in a category,” that are not easy to extend to the literary case. In this paper I consider two challenges in applying Walton’s argument to literature. First, what aspect of reading literature corresponds to perception in a category? Second, in what sense are literary categories “perceptually distinguishable”? Addressing either challenge requires identifying a psychological process that plays the role of sensory perception in reading literary texts.

Metadata

Statistics

DownloadsShow export options

Export as CSVJSONXML

Activity Overview

6 month trend

1Download

6 month trend

281Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

Archive Staff Only (login required)

Edit/View Item