Coole, Diana (2005) Agency, truth and meaning: judging the Hutton Report. British Journal of Political Science 35 (3), pp. 465-485. ISSN 0007-1234.
|
Text
Binder1.pdf Download (184kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The Hutton Report is now established as an important element of Britain's involvement in the Iraq War. In this article the ideas that underpin it are analysed. In particular, the focus is on Hutton's presuppositions concerning the nature of truth, agency, subjectivity, meaning and language. It is shown how unquestioned assumptions structured his method and shaped his conclusions. Although such presuppositions are widely shared by the public, too, a discursive conflict within the report is identified, revealing a sub-text of competing understandings that protagonists invoked. These suggest a more phenomenological and intersubjective approach to the interpretation of events. The conclusion is that Dr Kelly and the BBC were victims of a particular sense of truth and that Hutton failed to situate important actors and events within geopolitical, institutional, experiential and affective structures. The author suggests that a greater appreciation of the contingent way information enters the public domain (itself more evident in the Butler Report) is a pre-condition for better intelligence and public policy making.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Social Sciences |
| Research Centres and Institutes: | Birkbeck Centre for British Political Life |
| Depositing User: | Sandra Plummer |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Feb 2006 |
| Last Modified: | 30 Jun 2024 03:55 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/310 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
