Merdes, C. and von Sydow, M. and Hahn, Ulrike (2021) Formal models of source reliability. Synthese 198 , pp. 5773-5801. ISSN 0039-7857.
![[img]](https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
31658.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
|
|
Text
31658a.pdf - Published Version of Record Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper introduces, compares and contrasts formal models of source reliability proposed in the epistemology literature, in particular the prominent models of Bovens and Hartmann (2003) and Olsson (2011). All are Bayesian models seeking to provide normative guidance, yet they differ subtly in assumptions and resulting behavior. Models are evaluated both on conceptual grounds and through simulations, and the relationship between models is clarified. The simulations both show surprising similarities and highlight relevant differences between these models. Most importantly, however, our evaluations reveal that important normative concerns arguably remain unresolved. The philosophical implications of this for testimony are discussed.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Science > School of Psychological Sciences |
| Research Centres and Institutes: | Cognition, Computation and Modelling, Centre for |
| Depositing User: | Ulrike Hahn |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Apr 2020 10:46 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:59 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/31658 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
