Judicial review of compliance with the precautionary principle from Paraquat to Blaise: “Quantitative Thresholds,” risk assessment, and the gap between regulation and regulatory implementation
Leonelli, Giulia Claudia (2021) Judicial review of compliance with the precautionary principle from Paraquat to Blaise: “Quantitative Thresholds,” risk assessment, and the gap between regulation and regulatory implementation. German Law Journal 22 (2), pp. 184-215. ISSN 2071-8322.
![]() |
Text
43230.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript Restricted to Repository staff only Download (680kB) |
|
|
Text
43230a.pdf - Published Version of Record Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (282kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This Article frames the precautionary principle as an inner limit to the EU institutions’ broad discretion in the field of EU risk regulation, contextualizing recourse to the principle against the more encompassing backdrop of socially acceptable risk approaches. On these grounds, it inquires to what extent the precautionary principle may be successfully invoked in challenges to acts which are deemed insufficiently protective. The opening sections set the ground for the analysis. The third section analyzes challenges to regulatory acts, arguing that the Court has followed a quantitative threshold approach. This is legally tenable and appropriate; however, it cannot do justice to the true nature of the precautionary principle. The following sections analyze cases involving legislative acts. This includes an in-depth examination of the recent Blaise case, which has put judicial review of compliance with the precautionary principle under the spotlight. Against this overall background, this Article concludes that judicial review can hardly do justice to the precautionary principle, as applicable to the risk management process and underpinning EU legislative frameworks. It will ultimately rest on EU risk managers and EU legislators to ensure that the principle is applied and that its overarching goals are pursued.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Business and Law > Birkbeck Law School |
Depositing User: | Giulia Claudia Leonelli |
Date Deposited: | 19 Mar 2021 14:51 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 18:08 |
URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/43230 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.