Britain and the Iraq War

Bowring, Bill (2022) Britain and the Iraq War. In: Carty, T. (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in International Law. Oxford Bibliographies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199796953.

Abstract

The invasion of Iraq commenced on 18 March 2003, with the bombing of Iraqi targets by the US, the UK, Australia, Poland, Spain, Italy and Denmark. However, this Bibliography covers the period from the summer of 2001 to July 2016, when the Report (the Chilcot Report) of the UK’s Iran Inquiry was finally published, and also presents some more recent scholarly reflections. The Chilcot Report itself considered the period from the summer of 2001 to the end of July 2009, when UK forces left Southern Iraq. This Bibliography therefore starts with the Chilcot Report, with key references, and some scholarly reflections on its significance. As will be explained, the Report is a treasure trove of documents and analysis, and turned out to be much more hard-hitting than had been anticipated. Second, attention is drawn to two key major works of reference: the 2005 journal article by Gerry Simson, and the 2010 monograph by Marc Weller. Prior to March 2003, it had been widely anticipated that there would be military action against Iraq by the US and its allies, but that such action would be motivated by the “Bush doctrine” of pre-emptive action, namely the use of force, announced by President Bush on 1 June 2002. So the third section pays attention to the pre-2003 scholarly literature to this effect, including a Symposium which went to press just as the military action commenced. To the surprise of almost all commentators, the US and UK, despite having failed to secure authorisation from the UN Security Council, did advance a legal justification, which was in itself a relief for supporters of the UN and the international rule of law. But the US and UK did not rely on pre-emptive self-defence, but rather on the argument that the authorisation of use of force (“all necessary means”), in UN Security Council Resolution 678 of 29 November 1990 after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, had been revived, or was still operative, despite UNSC Resolution 687 of 3 April 1991 on the ceasefire. The fourth section reviews the relevant literature. Finally, references are given for some of the more significant literature on the consequences of the invasion. The majority of scholars have concluded the invasion and its incompetent follow-up are a direct cause of the rise of Daesh (“Islamic State”), the continued turmoil in Iraq, and the ongoing conflict in Syria. Attention then turns to violations of the International Law of Armed Conflict and International Human Rights Law, and finally to the longer term consequences of the invasion.

Metadata

Statistics

DownloadsShow export options

Export as XMLJSONCSV

Activity Overview

6 month trend

2Downloads

6 month trend

167Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

Archive Staff Only (login required)

Edit/View Item