Gemes, Ken (2006) Content & Watkins's account of natural axiomatizations. Dialectica 60 (1), pp. 85-92. ISSN 0012-2017.
|
Text
Binder1.pdf Download (166kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper briefly recounts the importance of the notion of natural axiomatizations for explicating hypothetico-deductivism, empirical significance, theoretical reduction, and organic fertility. Problems for the account of natural axiomatizations developed by John Watkins in Science and Scepticism and the revised account developed by Elie Zahar are demonstrated. It is then shown that Watkins's account can be salvaged from various counter-examples in a principled way by adding the demand that every axiom of a natural axiomatization should be part of the content of the theory being axiomatized. The crucial point here is that content cannot simply be identified with the set of logical consequences of a theory, but must be restricted to a proper subset of the consequence set. It is concluded that the revised Watkins account has certain advantages over the account of natural axiomatizations offered in Gemes (1993).
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com Copyright © Blackwell 2006. Dialectica: The official journal of the European Society for Analytic Philosophy is edited by Pascal Engel and Philipp Keller. Visit the Dialectica website at http://www.dialectica.ch/about_us.html for details of Dialectica's Editorial Board. |
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Historical Studies |
| Depositing User: | Sandra Plummer |
| Date Deposited: | 02 Aug 2007 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 16:47 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/521 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
