Smith, Barry C. (2007) What we mean, what we think we mean, and how language can surprise us. In: Soria, B. and Romero, E. (eds.) Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston's Pragmatics. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics: Language and Cognition Series. Basingstoke: Palgrave. (Submitted)
Text
598.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (223kB) |
Abstract
In uttering a sentence we are often take to assert more than its literal meaning - though sometimes we assert less. This phenomenon is taken by many to show that what is said or asserted by a speaker on an occasion is a contextually enriched or developed version of the semantic content of the words uttered. I argue that we can resist this conclusion by recognizing that what we think we are asserting, or take others to assert, involves selective attention to just one of the ways a sentence could be true and neglects others. In most conversations people converge in their selective attention and communication is not impaired. Though in the case of sentences involving predicates of personal taste, people's attention to aspects of what is claimed differs and this can lead to intractable disputes. I offer a diagnosis of such disputes where speakers can disagree about the same claim and both be right.
Metadata
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Keyword(s) / Subject(s): | Pragmatics, relativism, contextualism, predicates of personal taste |
School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Historical Studies |
Depositing User: | Barry Smith |
Date Deposited: | 24 Oct 2007 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 16:47 |
URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/598 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.