BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Freedom and unpredictability

    Garnett, Michael (2013) Freedom and unpredictability. Inquiry 56 (6), pp. 666-680. ISSN 0020-174X.

    This is the latest version of this item.

    [img]
    Preview
    Text
    Freedom and Unpredictability 6 [Final Draft].pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript

    Download (218kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    In A Metaphysics for Freedom (2012), Helen Steward proposes and defends a novel version of the libertarian account of free action. Amongst several objections that she considers to her view, one that looms particularly large is the Challenge from Chance: ‘the most powerful, widely-promulgated and important line of anti-libertarian reasoning’ (2012: 125). This paper begins by arguing that Steward’s response to the Challenge (or, at least, to one strand of it) is not fully convincing. It then goes on to explore a further possible libertarian line of defence against the Challenge, arguing that it, too, ultimately fails. The conclusion is that the Challenge remains an important source of dialectical advantage for the compatibilist.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    School: School of Social Sciences, History and Philosophy > Philosophy
    Depositing User: Michael Garnett
    Date Deposited: 10 Oct 2013 10:49
    Last Modified: 13 Feb 2021 02:50
    URI: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/8422

    Available Versions of this Item

    • Freedom and unpredictability. (deposited 10 Oct 2013 10:49) [Currently Displayed]

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    510Downloads
    184Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item