Catani, Damian (2013) The "Spleen" and "Ideal" of opium: Baudelaire and Thomas de Quincey. Dix-Neuf 17 (3), pp. 237-250. ISSN 1478-7318.
Abstract
De Quincey’s Confessions of an English Opium-Eater (1821), translated and adapted by Baudelaire as Un Mangeur d’Opium in Les Paradis artificiels (1860), presciently anticipated two antithetical types of discourse on drugs: the first, a Romantic, subversive literary discourse that valorizes drugs as a creative muse or ‘idéal’; the second, a normative medical discourse that stigmatizes drugs as addictive (‘spleen’). This article argues that, despite their ostensibly divergent positions, both these discourses are in fact undermined by the same cultural prejudice: namely, an artistic elite should be afforded special dispensation for drug-taking on the grounds of its inherent and undisputed genius. However, an alternative, more nuanced, position on drugs is provided by Baudelaire, whose assimilation of both medical and literary discourses in the 1840s paved the way for his pragmatic realignment of genius with childhood rather than madness, a realignment that not only partially anticipates Freud, but also allows for a more ethically responsible rehabilitation of opium use.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Keyword(s) / Subject(s): | Baudelaire, De Quincey, Freud, Leonardo da Vinci, opium, Romanticism, addiction, creativity, genius, childhood, madness |
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Creative Arts, Culture and Communication |
| Research Centres and Institutes: | Aesthetics of Kinship and Community, Birkbeck Research in (BRAKC) |
| Depositing User: | Administrator |
| Date Deposited: | 31 Oct 2013 10:24 |
| Last Modified: | 09 Aug 2023 12:34 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/8651 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
