Thompson, Michael and Ellison, S.L.R. (2011) Dark uncertainty. Accreditation and Quality Assurance 16 (10), pp. 483-487. ISSN 0949-1775.
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00769-011-0803-0
Abstract
Standard uncertainties obtained by the GUM approach for a range of analytical methods are compared directly and indirectly with estimates of reproducibility standard deviation for the same methods. Results were obtained from both routine analysis and international key comparisons. A general tendency for the uncertainty to be substantially less than the reproducibility standard deviation was found.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Science > School of Natural Sciences |
Depositing User: | Sarah Hall |
Date Deposited: | 18 Feb 2014 11:23 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:09 |
URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/9205 |
Statistics
Downloads
Activity Overview
6 month trend
6 month trend
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.