Marno, H. and Csibra, Gergely (2015) Toddlers favor communicatively presented information over statistical reliability in learning about artifacts. PLoS One 10 (3), e0122129. ISSN 1932-6203.
|
Text
11843.pdf - Published Version of Record Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (241kB) | Preview |
|
Other (Data collected from the Experimental Group)
11843(a).xlsx - Supplemental Material Download (10kB) |
||
Other (Data collected from the Control Group.)
11843(b).XLSX - Supplemental Material Download (40kB) |
Abstract
Observed associations between events can be validated by statistical information of reliability or by testament of communicative sources. We tested whether toddlers learn from their own observation of efficiency, assessed by statistical information on reliability of interventions, or from communicatively presented demonstration, when these two potential types of evidence of validity of interventions on a novel artifact are contrasted with each other. Eighteen-month-old infants observed two adults, one operating the artifact by a method that was more efficient (2/3 probability of success) than that of the other (1/3 probability of success). Compared to the Baseline condition, in which communicative signals were not employed, infants tended to choose the less reliable method to operate the artifact when this method was demonstrated in a communicative manner in the Experimental condition. This finding demonstrates that, in certain circumstances, communicative sanctioning of reliability may override statistical evidence for young learners. Such a bias can serve fast and efficient transmission of knowledge between generations.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Science > School of Psychological Sciences |
Research Centres and Institutes: | Brain and Cognitive Development, Centre for (CBCD) |
Depositing User: | Administrator |
Date Deposited: | 19 Mar 2015 08:14 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:15 |
URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/11843 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.